david@lang.hm wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> 
>> Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
>>
>> On Jun 20, 2007, Andrew McKay <amckay@iders.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> However, I don't see how this would ever require a company like Tivo
>>> or Mastercard to have their networks play nice with a unit that has
>>> been modified by the end user, potentially opening up some serious
>>> security holes.
>>
>> Which is why the GPLv3 doesn't make the requirement that you stated.
> 
> so if the BIOS checked the checksum of the boot image and if it found it 
> wasn't correct would disable the video input hardware but let you boot 
> the system otherwise it would be acceptable to you and the GPLv3?
> 
> somehow I doubt it, but that's what it would take to prevent modified 
> software from interacting with their networks (remembering that these 
> networks are the cable and satellite networks in some cases)
> 
> it also seems that if this was the case it would be a trivial 
> work-around for the GPLv3 if it was acceptable.
> 

That is exactly where I was going with that.  A trivial work around in the Tivo 
case.  I guess GPLv4 will have to close up that hole?

Andrew McKay
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/