On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 14:37 -0700, Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:
quoted text
> plain text document attachment (intel_iommu_pf_memalloc.patch)
> Intel IOMMU driver needs memory during DMA map calls to setup its internal
> page tables and for other data structures. As we all know that these DMA 
> map calls are mostly called in the interrupt context or with the spinlock 
> held by the upper level drivers(network/storage drivers), so in order to 
> avoid any memory allocation failure due to low memory issues,
> this patch makes memory allocation by temporarily setting PF_MEMALLOC
> flags for the current task before making memory allocation calls.
> 
> We evaluated mempools as a backup when kmem_cache_alloc() fails
> and found that mempools are really not useful here because
>  1) We don;t know for sure how much to reserve in advance

So you just unleashed an unbounded allocation context on PF_MEMALLOC?
seems like a really really bad idea.

quoted text
>  2) And mempools are not useful for GFP_ATOMIC case (as we call 
>     memory alloc functions with GFP_ATOMIC)

Mempools work as intended with GFP_ATOMIC, it gets filled up to the
specified number of elements using GFP_KERNEL (at creation time). This
gives GFP_ATOMIC allocations nr_elements extra items once it would start
failing.

quoted text
> With PF_MEMALLOC flag set in the current->flags, the VM subsystem avoids
> any watermark checks before allocating memory thus guarantee'ing the 
> memory till the last free page.

PF_MEMALLOC as is, is meant to salvage the VM from the typical VM
deadlock. Using it as you do now is not something a driver should ever
do, and I'm afraid I will have to strongly oppose this patch.

You really really want to calculate an upper bound on your memory
consumption and reserve this.

So, I'm afraid I'll have to..

NACK!

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/