Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/slab.c:777 warning

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Srinivasa Ds <srinivasa@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...>, Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...>, <pj@...>, <simon.derr@...>, <clameter@...>, <rientjes@...>
Date: Friday, June 1, 2007 - 8:41 pm

Christoph Lameter wrote:

That only applies to allocations with constant sizes. One presumes
nobody is explicitly doing kmalloc(0), so we can use a separate
runtime-computed-size path to do poisoning. (Which is probably 90% of
the problem, since people who kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo)) will generally
stay within bounds without too much effort.)

J
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/sla..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jun 1, 4:30 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/sla..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jun 1, 8:43 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/sla..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jun 1, 8:59 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/sla..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jun 1, 8:41 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/sla..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jun 1, 8:46 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/sla..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jun 1, 4:56 pm)