Am Montag 18 Juni 2007 20:55 schrieb Alexandre Oliva:
quoted text
> On Jun 18, 2007, Hans-Jürgen Koch <hjk@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > So, if a manufacturer used a ROM instead of a flash memory with the
> > intention to make software modifications impossible, then it is bad,
> > and when he did it for economical reasons, then it is a "natural barrier"?
> 
> This sounds about right to me.
> 
> Intent is very significant, but then, what vendor would justify the
> choice of ROM as "intent to prevent modifications", if this amounted
> to copyright infringement?

Indeed. That nicely shows how useless any licensing discussion is
when it comes to hardware design issues, including "Tivoization". 

quoted text
> 
> Vendor would be entitled to the benefit of the doubt as to the
> motivations in this case, so it would likely be unenforceable anyway.
>

Right. If GPL v3 comes out, there'll probably be a new task for
hardware development engineers: How to find excuses for hardware that
prevents software modifications and how to conceal the true intent.

Hans
 
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/