RE: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Luck, Tony
Date: Friday, June 15, 2007 - 11:49 am

> > >   A good heuristic, though, might be to limit

Me too.  As I increase the number of arguments, I now have
a smooth cutover from "works" to "Arg list too long", without
the in between zone where the process is killed.

The IA-32 compatability exec path is now working too (I didn't
stress it too hard, but I did try argument lists up to a megabyte).

Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Jun 13, 3:03 am)
RE: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Luck, Tony, (Wed Jun 13, 4:36 pm)
Re: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Ollie Wild, (Wed Jun 13, 11:23 pm)
Re: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jun 14, 1:38 am)
RE: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Luck, Tony, (Thu Jun 14, 11:22 am)
RE: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jun 14, 11:32 am)
Re: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Ollie Wild, (Thu Jun 14, 1:58 pm)
Re: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jun 14, 2:18 pm)
Re: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Jun 15, 2:24 am)
Re: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Ollie Wild, (Fri Jun 15, 11:07 am)
RE: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Luck, Tony, (Fri Jun 15, 11:49 am)
Re: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Pavel Machek, (Sun Jun 17, 11:32 am)
Re: [patch 0/3] no MAX_ARG_PAGES -v2, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Jun 17, 12:07 pm)