On Thu 14 Jun 2007 13:46, Alexandre Oliva pondered:I don't think so - the GPL3 doesn't state that you must convey the same rights to end users that you have, it says you must provide installation information, including your keys, or you can not ship the product. That is the way I read the following sections (let me know if I mis-read anything): ====================== "Installation Information" for a User Product means any methods, procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to install and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User Product from a modified version of its Corresponding Source. The information must suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of the modified object code is in no case prevented or interfered with solely because modification has been made. If conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot convey the Program, or other covered work, so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not convey it at all. =================== I read "are imposed on you (or otherwise)" to mean "by you" as well. If so, you throwing away the private keys are not an option. I need to think a bit more of Rob's opinion of ROM's are illegal - but providing the installation information of "send $1M NRE and object code to xxx ROM vendor, and wait 16 weeks for 500k units, take one to a board shop, pay $1k for them to re-work your BGA - if the xray says it is screwed up, you have 499,999 other units to try." - may meet the language, but doesn't meet the spirit of the GPL either... -Robin -
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
