On Friday 15 June 2007 06:18:59 David Greaves wrote:
I agree. I stated it in the terms I did because Alexandre originally
brought "ethics and morality" into the discussion. Not that my word choice is
wrong at all - violating a copyright license is, after all, illegal.
I agree that it is "bad for the community". The impression I've gotten from
reading the GPLv3, reading transcripts of interviews with RMS, reading
transcripts of interview with Eben Moglen *and* from the FSFLA members
participating in this discussion the reason for the anti-tivoization language
in GPLv3 isn't "its bad for the community" but "we find it ethically and
morally wrong". That being the reason, what they are saying with the language
in the GPLv3 is "this is bad/evil and things that are bad/evil should be
illegal".
:) Same here
It is. Consumed a solid six-hour stretch of my day (5PM EDT to 11PM EDT, June
14, 2007) (FYI: EDT is UTC - 4)
Good for you!
DRH
--
Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful.
-