On Jun 14, 2007, Daniel Hazelton  wrote:
> User B buys the router and modifies the kernel so it drives the WiFi to an

quoted text
> output power twice that which it is licensed to carry.

> FCC finds out and prosecutes User B for violating the regulations.

Ok so far.
> FCC then pulls the small companies license until they change their

quoted text
> hardware so the driver can't push it to transmit at a higher power

> level and levies a fine.

I'd say this is unfair, but if it can happen, then maybe the small

company could have been more careful about the regulations.  There are

various ways to prevent these changes that don't involve imposing

restrictions of modification on any software in the device, all the

way from hardware-constrained output power to hardware-verified

authorized configuration parameters.
> Growing the base of installed GPL covered software,
When this doesn't bring freedom to people, when people can't actually

enjoy the freedoms that the software is supposed to provide, I don't

see why this would be a good thing.  What's the merit in being able to

claim "vendor X chose my Free Software and locked it down such that

users don't get the freedoms I meant for them, and I'm happy about it?"
--

Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/

FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/

Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}

Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

-

unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/