On Jun 13, 2007, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> Still doesn't explain why you have argued that the GPLv3 doesn't
It doesn't cover hardware, in the same way that it doesn't cover
patents, and it doesn't cover pro-DRM laws. It merely arranges, as
best as we've managed a copyright license to do, that they can't be
used as excuses (or tools) to disrespect the freedoms that the GPL
demands all licensees to respect for other users.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [2.6.22.2 review 05/84] Fix deadlocks in sparc serial console. |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Jeff Kirsher | [RESEND][NET-NEXT PATCH 01/29] ixgbe: fix bug where using wake queue instead of st... |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Manuel Bouyer | Re: Interactive performance in -current |
| Christian Limpach | Re: newfs: determining file system parameters |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | Re: statvfs(2) replacement for statfs(2) patch |
| Charles M. Hannum | Re: kern/22869: Slave IDE drive not detected |
