On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:06:57PM +0200, holzheu wrote:
quoted text
> Current prototype implementation:
> ================================= 
> 
> The structure of a kernel message is: <component>.<msg number>: <msg>
> 
> * component: Name of the kernel or driver component e.g. "pci", "ide", 
>   etc.
> * msg number: Within the component unique number of a kernel message.
> * msg: printk message
> 
> New macros KMSG_ERR(), KMSG_WARN(), etc. are defined, which have to be
> used in printk. These macros have as parameter the message number and
> are using a per c-file defined macro KMSG_COMPONENT.
> 
> Example: Define message 2 in component "kmsgtest":
> 
> #define KMSG_COMPONENT "kmsgtest"
> 
> void f(void)
> {
>         printk(KMSG_ERR(1) "device %x not online\n", devno);
> }

Ick, why are you ignoring what we have already with dev_printk() and
friends?  We are just finally getting developers to use that, I think it
will be almost impossible to get people to change to something else,
especially one that isn't even as "correct" as what dev_printk() offers
you today, will be quite hard.

So, why not use what we already have and work off of it?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/