Ingo Molnar wrote:

quoted text
> * Tarkan Erimer  wrote:

>

>

>> [...] Just, I asked simple question and included a simple example in

>> it. [...]

>>

>

> actually, what you said was this:

>

> " I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License"

>   the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL

>   compatible.). "

>

Why don't you include the last sentence I wrote: "So,we should have more

fruits (like ZFS,DTrace etc.) ;-) "

So, that's why I said it. Because, as all the time, we did it: Importing

and exporting codes to/from different open source projects.

> and to that the answer was:

quoted text
>

> " The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not want to

>   accept GPLv3 [...] "

>

> in other words: your hypothetical is false today. You called us to do a

> specific action, but why did you then include a factually false

> 'example' to underline that point of yours? Or if you simply did not

> know about the OpenSolaris community's position beforehand, why dont you

> just admit that and withdraw from that line of argument gracefully?

>

> 	Ingo

>   

As I mentioned in my previous posts: This is **not** in the hands of the

"OpenSolaris Community" to make and apply such decision. Sun itself

**will decide** it. Also, there are strong indications that Sun is very

interested to make "OpenSolaris" at least "Dual-Licensed" with GPLv3.
Regards,
Tarkan

-

unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/