* Tarkan Erimer  wrote:
> > > >> I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License"

quoted text
> > > >> the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL

> > > >> compatible.).

> > > >

> > > > The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not

> > > > want to accept GPLv3, why not discuss this with them if you want

> > > > to try to change their minds?

> > >

> > > It was just an example came to my mind at first when thinking

> > > about "Dual Licensing" or upgrading Linux Kernel to the GPLv3.

> > > Yeah maybe,the "OpenSolaris Community" do not want GPLv3. But;

> > > IMHO, it is in the hands of "Sun" not the "OpenSolaris Community".

> >

> > Perhaps.  However, since the only thing in hands of your kind of

> > advocates is best not mentioned on a family-friendly maillist, may I

> > suggest taking that exciting thread to more appropriate place?

>

> I don't think that this thread is going unfriendly or harmfully.

> However, what is your suggestion ?

if you want to change the minds of the OpenSolaris community, i'd

proffer that it's perhaps more efficient to talk to them, not to the

linux-kernel mailing list. Thanks,
	Ingo

-

unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/