* Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@netone.net.tr> wrote:

quoted text
> > > >> I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" 
> > > >> the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL 
> > > >> compatible.).
> > > >
> > > > The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not 
> > > > want to accept GPLv3, why not discuss this with them if you want 
> > > > to try to change their minds?
> > >
> > > It was just an example came to my mind at first when thinking 
> > > about "Dual Licensing" or upgrading Linux Kernel to the GPLv3. 
> > > Yeah maybe,the "OpenSolaris Community" do not want GPLv3. But; 
> > > IMHO, it is in the hands of "Sun" not the "OpenSolaris Community".
> >
> > Perhaps.  However, since the only thing in hands of your kind of 
> > advocates is best not mentioned on a family-friendly maillist, may I 
> > suggest taking that exciting thread to more appropriate place?
>
> I don't think that this thread is going unfriendly or harmfully. 
> However, what is your suggestion ?

if you want to change the minds of the OpenSolaris community, i'd 
proffer that it's perhaps more efficient to talk to them, not to the 
linux-kernel mailing list. Thanks,

	Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/