On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tarkan Erimer wrote:I was impressed in the sense that it was a hell of a lot better than the disaster that were the earlier drafts. I still think GPLv2 is simply the better license. I consider dual-licensing unlikely (and technically quite hard), but at least _possible_ in theory. I have yet to see any actual *reasons* for licensing under the GPLv3, though. All I've heard are shrill voices about "tivoization" (which I expressly think is ok) and panicked worries about Novell-MS (which seems way overblown, and quite frankly, the argument seems to not so much be about the Novell deal, as about an excuse to push the GPLv3). Linus -
| KOSAKI Motohiro | [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Nick Piggin | [patch 3/6] mm: fix fault vs invalidate race for linear mappings |
| Stefan Richter | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
| Ingo Molnar | [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
git: | |
| Peter Zijlstra | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Robert Blum | And another version of the INFO sheet |
| Marc CORSINI | find-1.2 (binaries only) |
| Yanek Martinson | Re: Porting g++ 1.40.3 |
