On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
I was impressed in the sense that it was a hell of a lot better than the
disaster that were the earlier drafts.
I still think GPLv2 is simply the better license.
I consider dual-licensing unlikely (and technically quite hard), but at
least _possible_ in theory. I have yet to see any actual *reasons* for
licensing under the GPLv3, though. All I've heard are shrill voices about
"tivoization" (which I expressly think is ok) and panicked worries about
Novell-MS (which seems way overblown, and quite frankly, the argument
seems to not so much be about the Novell deal, as about an excuse to push
the GPLv3).
Linus
-
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH x86] [0/16] Various i386/x86-64 changes |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Kirsher | [net-next PATCH 1/7] e1000e: enable CRC stripping by default |
| Jukka Andberg | ata/wdc vs gcc3 on amiga |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | Re: wd.c patch to reduce kernel stack usage |
| Jason Thorpe | Re: ksyms patches. |
| rick | NFS transport |
