login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
June
»
10
Re: libata limiting to UDMA/33 instead of UDMA/100
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Alan Cox <alan@...>
To: Udo A. Steinberg <us15@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: libata limiting to UDMA/33 instead of UDMA/100
Date: Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 12:08 pm
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 13:21:24 +0200 "Udo A. Steinberg" <us15@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
quoted text
> Hi, > > After switching an older machine over from the PDC20265 PATA driver to the > libata driver pata_pdc202xx_old my HDDs are now limited to UDMA/33. With the > old driver they were happily running with UDMA/100.
...
quoted text
> > I'm including the relevant kernel output for both cases below.
Thanks.
quoted text
> scsi0 : pata_pdc202xx_old > scsi1 : pata_pdc202xx_old > ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00019400 ctl 0x00019002 bmdma 0x00018000 irq 0 > ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00018800 ctl 0x00018402 bmdma 0x00018008 irq 0 > ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 60036480, hpa_sectors = 60036480 > ata1.00: ATA-5: IBM-DTLA-307030, TX4OA5AA, max UDMA/100 > ata1.00: 60036480 sectors, multi 16: LBA > ata1.01: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 241254720, hpa_sectors = 241254720 > ata1.01: ATA-6: IC35L120AVV207-0, V24OA63A, max UDMA/100 > ata1.01: 241254720 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 > ata1.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable > ata1.01: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
What sort of cable is actually in use here ? Alan -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
libata limiting to UDMA/33 instead of UDMA/100
, Udo A. Steinberg
, (Sat Jun 9, 7:21 am)
Re: libata limiting to UDMA/33 instead of UDMA/100
, Alan Cox
, (Sun Jun 10, 12:08 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Heiko Carstens
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
573 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
Syndicate