Michael-Luke Jones <mlj28@cam.ac.uk> writes:

quoted text
> Already in mach-ixp4xx, so can just be called npe.c

I want ixp4xx_ prefix in module name, otherwise I'd call it npe.c,
sure.

quoted text
> Debugging code? Can this go?

Why? Especially with code having to work with third party binary-only
firmware? Suicide. They are eliminated at build time = performance
hit (OTOH this file isn't on any fast path).

quoted text
> It may be a matter of taste, but could some of the many definitions
> at the top of ixp4xx_npe.c go in the header file here?

It's actually not only a matter of taste, they are private
to the .c file and I don't want to make them available to the
public (but sure, I don't like them in .c either, I think nobody
likes such definitions anywhere but they have to exist somewhere).
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/