On 5/8/07, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:You're absolutely right, but to give Jeff the benefit of the doubt I'm sure he _meant_ "users" there although he said "developers". Stating the obvious, the developer _has_ to know what stuff his code uses anyway, otherwise what does he "select"s or "depends" his config option on. As for users, we _can_ avoid pitfalls by building a complete dependency tree and just selecting _everything_ that we require for a particular config option to be selected, but some users could conceivably prefer only being _told_ about what else they need to successfully pick a config option (than everything just getting in behind their backs). Actually (correct me if I'm wrong), this is not presently possible: an option is not visible unless dependencies are already picked. Just a suggestion, though. -
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Gabriel C | Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Thomas Jarosch | Re: TCP connection stalls under 2.6.24.7 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
