On 5/8/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
quoted text
> Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Yes, mixing select and depends is a recipe for build disasters. Call
> > me a rabid fanatic, but I would in fact go as far as to say that this
> > whole "select" thing in the Kconfig process is one big BUG, and not a
> > feature. People are lazy by nature and would rather just "select" a
> > dependency for their config option than burden users with several
> > "depends".
>
> Tough, the kernel community has voted against you.

Heh ... I guess I appeared a trifle _too_ fanatic there, but I'm not.
That rant against it was actually more about controlling its
{ab-,mis-}use and rampant proliferation (even to cases where it is
inapplicable / avoidable) than removing it altogether. Especially,
when a developer is lazy / wrong and mixes select and depends in the
same dependency chain leading to errors.

quoted text
> It makes far more sense to include a driver during kernel configuration,
> and have that driver pull in its libraries via 'select'.  The lame
> alternative requires developers to know which libraries they need BEFORE
> picking their drivers, which is backwards and requires legwork on the
> part of the kernel developer.

(That bit about a developer _knowing_ which libraries to select
manually before selecting a driver is not really true, you can "?" on
a config item and get all its "depends" and "select" dependencies
anyway -- and it requires more leg work, yes, but then you'll never
have build failures either)

Still, I don't really disagree w.r.t. "select"ing libraries, as long
as we're careful to limit them to _only_ libraries.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/