login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
May
»
30
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Tero Roponen <teanropo@...>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>
Subject:
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - 12:01 pm
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:02:49 +0300 (EEST) Tero Roponen <teanropo@jyu.fi> wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > > > On 5/30/07, Tero Roponen <teanropo@jyu.fi> wrote: > > > > Hmmm, I just found something interesting. In 2.6.21.3 the /sbin/init > > > > gets corrupted when I watch the video! > > > > > > > > $ cp /sbin/init init.before > > > > $ mplayer kiwi.flv > > > > $ cp /sbin/init init.after > > > > > > > > The sha1sums are here: > > > > > > > > 52c8d643057619cbe137b8e69d4709ce3bdd832d init.after > > > > 8efc7864a5b535a9e336fa82e9d7f112f3d956c1 init.before > > > > > > > > It seems that something corrupts memory somewhere... > > > > > > To debug this a bit further: > > > > > > $ od -a -t x1 -v init.after > init.after.dump > > > $ od -a -t x1 -v init.before > init.before.dump > > > $ diff -u init.before.dump init.after.dump | less > > > > > > -0011340 nul nul nul e9 f0 fe ff ff ff % < soh enq bs h 80 > > > - 00 00 00 e9 f0 fe ff ff ff 25 3c 01 05 08 68 80 > > > +0010000 y ack nul nul y ack nul nul y ack nul nul y ack nul nul > > > + 79 06 00 00 79 06 00 00 79 06 00 00 79 06 00 00 > > > +0010020 y ack nul nul y ack nul nul y ack nul nul y ack nul nul > > > + 79 06 00 00 79 06 00 00 79 06 00 00 79 06 00 00 > > > +0011340 y ack nul nul y ack nul nul ff % < soh enq bs h 80 > > > + 79 06 00 00 79 06 00 00 ff 25 3c 01 05 08 68 80 > > > > > > The file at offset 0010000 - 0011348 is overwritten with the byte > > > pattern 79 06 00 00. > > > > > > Do you see anything in the logs or is this a silent corruption? Did > > > you see this corruption with 2.6.19 or 2.6.22-rc3? > > > > > > > I recompiled 2.6.22-rc3 and booted it with slub_debug. Now I can't oops > > the kernel, but ./slab_info -v gives me a warning: > > > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > neofb: no support for 32bpp > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1024x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1280x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1280x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1280x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > Mode (1280x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600) > > *** SLUB kmalloc-1024: Redzone Active@0xc10be860 slab 0xc10217c0 > > offset=2144 flags=0x80004082 inuse=7 freelist=0x00000000 > > Bytes b4 0xc10be850: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ........ZZZZZZZZ > > Object 0xc10be860: 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 20 03 00 00 58 02 00 00 ............X... > > Object 0xc10be870: 20 03 00 00 58 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....X........... > > Object 0xc10be880: 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 ................ > > Object 0xc10be890: 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ > > Object 0xc10be8a0: 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ > > Object 0xc10be8b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ > > Object 0xc10be8c0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 a8 61 00 00
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Sun May 27, 5:06 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Mon May 28, 3:22 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Mon May 28, 5:34 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Tue May 29, 12:04 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Tue May 29, 2:57 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Tue May 29, 11:57 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Wed May 30, 1:54 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Wed May 30, 8:02 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Andrew Morton
, (Wed May 30, 11:39 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Wed May 30, 12:01 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Antonino A. Daplas
, (Wed May 30, 7:17 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Antonino A. Daplas
, (Wed May 30, 6:14 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Wed May 30, 2:13 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Wed May 30, 2:27 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Andrew Morton
, (Wed May 30, 12:09 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Wed May 30, 2:04 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Antonino A. Daplas
, (Wed May 30, 7:14 pm)
Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Geert Uytterhoeven
, (Thu May 31, 3:17 am)
Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Antonino A. Daplas
, (Thu May 31, 5:04 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, David Miller
, (Wed May 30, 7:18 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Antonino A. Daplas
, (Wed May 30, 7:28 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Wed May 30, 2:00 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Wed May 30, 1:59 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Tue May 29, 11:43 pm)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Tero Roponen
, (Mon May 28, 4:08 am)
Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Mon May 28, 3:47 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
Alan Stern
Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1
Satyam Sharma
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
William Lee Irwin III
Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Dale Farnsworth
Re: [PATCH 03/39] mv643xx_eth: shorten reg names
Jarek Poplawski
Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
9 users
and
1076 guests
online.
Online users
zeekec
shifterkart2009
MiaCline
terinewlinao
vegetarianfood
smallflatscree
personaltraini
clutter23
onlineprofithkz
Syndicate