Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - 9:00 am

On Wed, 30 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

Yes. After all, STR simply shouldn't _care_.

The rule should be that in a well-written setup, STR "just works" whether 
user processes are suspended or not. In other words, the whole freezing 
part isn't about STR. It should be totally immaterial.

(Of course, that assumes that the freezing is _sane_, of course: ie the 
core kernel threads shouldn't all be frozen. I think Rafael's patch to 
turn the defaults around are a big step in the right direction).

			Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 12:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:06 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 9:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 3:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 3:30 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Thu May 24, 4:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:18 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 1:52 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 2:22 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 4:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 11:32 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 12:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 1:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:08 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 30, 9:00 am)