login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
May
»
30
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...>
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: <nigel@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - 10:07 am
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:04:22PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted text
> On Wednesday, 30 May 2007 15:17, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 13:40 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > So keep the driver layers read-only and unfreeze the processes after > > > doing the atomic copy. > > > > I know you probably won't care, but that's not an option for Suspend2 - > > I get the possibility of a full image by overwriting LRU pages that were > > saved prior to the atomic copy. > > This generally is a problem, not only for suspend2. :-) > > Once you've unfrozen the user land, we can't rely on the hibernation image any > more, because some tasks may cause the on-disk filesystems' state to change.
Hence "keep the driver layers read-only" :) -- Matthew Garrett |
mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue May 22, 6:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 8:06 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 12:16 pm)
pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 4:04 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 4:27 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Thu May 24, 5:03 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 6:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 6:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 6:23 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 6:39 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 6:32 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh...
, (Thu May 24, 7:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 7:19 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Fri May 25, 7:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 6:17 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 6:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun May 27, 11:57 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Sun May 27, 12:26 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon May 28, 6:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Mon May 28, 12:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue May 29, 9:04 am)
Re: [stable] pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69]...
, Greg KH
, (Tue May 29, 1:23 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun May 27, 12:43 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun May 27, 2:32 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun May 27, 2:44 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun May 27, 9:05 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Mon May 28, 4:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Mon May 28, 8:10 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon May 28, 8:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Mon May 28, 9:03 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon May 28, 9:06 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Mon May 28, 6:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun May 27, 3:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Tue May 29, 4:31 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue May 29, 10:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Wed May 30, 6:26 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Randy Dunlap
, (Wed May 30, 11:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 7:18 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 8:37 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Kay Sievers
, (Tue May 29, 2:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Tue May 29, 8:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Michael-Luke Jones
, (Tue May 29, 8:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Kay Sievers
, (Tue May 29, 9:15 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Tue May 29, 8:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri May 25, 5:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Thu May 24, 9:55 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 10:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Thu May 24, 10:20 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 10:41 pm)
Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second h...
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri May 25, 5:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Thu May 24, 11:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 11:31 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri May 25, 12:33 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Mark Lord
, (Tue May 29, 10:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Tue May 29, 5:22 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue May 29, 5:33 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Wed May 30, 7:49 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Wed May 30, 8:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Wed May 30, 11:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Wed May 30, 9:17 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Wed May 30, 10:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Wed May 30, 6:21 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Wed May 30, 10:07 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Wed May 30, 9:29 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Wed May 30, 10:08 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed May 30, 12:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Tue May 29, 6:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri May 25, 12:49 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Mark Lord
, (Tue May 29, 10:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri May 25, 1:18 am)
Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stable...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 11:06 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 11:28 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 11:52 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 4:21 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 4:33 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 4:35 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 5:36 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 6:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 6:49 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Fri May 25, 5:22 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri May 25, 12:19 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Fri May 25, 4:52 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 4:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu May 24, 5:01 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Thu May 24, 5:12 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu May 24, 5:21 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Fri May 25, 1:12 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 5:51 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Johannes Stezenbach
, (Thu May 24, 6:30 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 5:28 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Romano Giannetti
, (Wed May 23, 3:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Paolo Ornati
, (Wed May 23, 3:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Romano Giannetti
, (Wed May 23, 3:38 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
James Bottomley
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers
majkls
sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
Paul Mackerras
Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
KOSAKI Motohiro
[bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
git-commits-head
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
937 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
tgrey
roundtheruggedd
Syndicate