Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » May » 30

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Matthew Garrett
Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - 6:29 am

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:17:47PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:


It's a problem that effectively has to be solved for STR anyway if 
we're going to suspend without freezing. The midlayers need to be able 
to block requests when the low-level devices are suspended, so we can 
just re-use that code.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 12:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:06 am)
Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stab ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 8:06 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:28 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:52 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 9:16 am)
pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 1:04 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 1:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 1:21 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 1:27 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 1:33 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 1:35 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 2:01 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Sam Ravnborg, (Thu May 24, 2:12 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 2:21 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 2:28 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 2:36 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 2:51 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 3:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 3:10 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 3:14 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 3:17 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 3:23 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 3:30 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 3:32 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 3:39 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 3:49 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 3:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Thu May 24, 4:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 4:18 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 4:19 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 5:37 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 6:55 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 7:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 7:20 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 7:41 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 8:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:31 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 9:33 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 9:49 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Sam Ravnborg, (Thu May 24, 10:12 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:18 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 1:52 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 2:19 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 2:22 am)
Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second ..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 2:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 4:44 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 25, 9:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 8:57 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 27, 9:26 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 9:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 11:32 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 11:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 12:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 6:05 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 1:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 3:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 5:10 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 5:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 6:03 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 6:06 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 28, 9:53 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Mon May 28, 3:53 pm)
Re: [stable] pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/6 ..., Greg KH, (Mon May 28, 10:23 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Kay Sievers, (Mon May 28, 11:55 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Romano Giannetti, (Tue May 29, 1:31 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue May 29, 6:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Kay Sievers, (Tue May 29, 6:15 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 7:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 7:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 7:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 2:22 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 2:33 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 3:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 30, 3:26 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 4:49 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 5:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 6:17 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 6:29 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 7:07 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:08 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 8:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Randy Dunlap, (Wed May 30, 8:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 30, 9:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 3:21 pm)