Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 - 5:38 pm

On Mon, 28 May 2007 21:16:31 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:


Here we use struct m68k_fixup_info.


and later we define it.

How come it doesn't spit warnings?

I think it could be tightened up even if it happens not to warn?

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Mon May 28, 12:16 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 29, 5:38 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Eric Dumazet, (Tue May 29, 10:48 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Wed May 30, 12:06 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Joerg Dorchain, (Wed May 30, 1:20 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Andreas Schwab, (Wed May 30, 1:23 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Wed May 30, 4:19 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Joerg Dorchain, (Wed May 30, 4:40 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 30, 11:03 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure, Wouter Verhelst, (Sun Jun 3, 8:56 am)