Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 - 3:39 pm

Gary Zambrano wrote:


This is normal.

We check for 0xffffffff because that is often how a fault is indicated, 
when the memory location is read during or immediately after hotplug (or 
if the PCI bus is truly faulty).  So for most hardware, you see

tmp = read(irq status)
if (!tmp)
	return irq-none		/* no irq events raised */
if (tmp == 0xffffffff)
	return irq-none		/* hot unplug or h/w fault */

and the method that determines no interrupt handling is needed.

Regards,

	Jeff


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Sun May 27, 12:25 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Sun May 27, 12:45 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Sun May 27, 1:36 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Sun May 27, 1:46 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Sun May 27, 2:13 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Sun May 27, 2:16 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Sun May 27, 2:46 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Sun May 27, 2:50 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Sun May 27, 3:15 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Sun May 27, 5:24 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Sun May 27, 5:40 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Mon May 28, 3:16 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Mon May 28, 3:49 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Mon May 28, 7:09 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Mon May 28, 7:12 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Mon May 28, 7:55 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Mon May 28, 8:14 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Thomas Gleixner, (Mon May 28, 8:32 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Mon May 28, 8:43 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Mon May 28, 10:44 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Thomas Gleixner, (Mon May 28, 12:23 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Mon May 28, 1:55 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Thomas Gleixner, (Mon May 28, 2:45 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Gary Zambrano, (Tue May 29, 6:58 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Gary Zambrano, (Tue May 29, 7:14 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Tue May 29, 10:23 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Tue May 29, 11:28 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Tue May 29, 1:45 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Stephen Hemminger, (Tue May 29, 2:01 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Gary Zambrano, (Tue May 29, 2:05 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Gary Zambrano, (Tue May 29, 2:36 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Jeff Garzik, (Tue May 29, 3:39 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Michael Buesch, (Wed May 30, 3:45 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Sun Jun 3, 9:26 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Thomas Gleixner, (Sun Jun 3, 11:39 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Jun 4, 9:09 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend), Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Jun 4, 9:35 am)
iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?), Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Jun 4, 9:59 am)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?), Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Jun 4, 10:32 am)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?), Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Jun 4, 10:51 am)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?), Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Jun 4, 12:00 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?), Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Jun 4, 12:26 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Mon Jun 4, 12:47 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?), Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Jun 4, 1:02 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?), Maximilian Engelhardt, (Mon Jun 4, 1:52 pm)