login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
May
»
29
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Nigel Cunningham
Subject:
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 - 2:22 pm
Hi. On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 10:19 -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
quoted text
> Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > > I'm sorry to say it, but dropping process freezing still seems to me > > like the better way though. I prefer it because of the reliability > > aspect. With the current code, having frozen processes, I can look at > > the state of memory, calculate how much I'll need for this or that and > > know that I'll have sufficient memory for the atomic copy and for doing > > the I/O (making assumptions about how much memory drivers will > > allocate) before I start to do either. If we stop freezing processes, > > that predictability will go away. There'll always be a possibility that > > some process will get memory hungry and stop me from being able to get > > the image on disk, and I'll have to either abort or give up and try > > again and again until I can complete writing the image, the battery run=
s
quoted text
> > out or whatever...=20 >=20 > How about blocking brk() and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS) in addition to > the filesystem VFS callers? Or is that starting to get messy again?
Yeah. Getting messy again :) Nigel
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue May 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Romano Giannetti
, (Wed May 23, 12:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Paolo Ornati
, (Wed May 23, 12:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Romano Giannetti
, (Wed May 23, 12:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 5:06 am)
Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stab ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 8:06 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 8:28 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 8:52 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 9:16 am)
pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 1:04 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 1:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 1:21 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 1:27 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 1:33 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 1:35 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu May 24, 2:01 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Thu May 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Thu May 24, 2:12 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu May 24, 2:21 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 2:28 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 2:36 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 2:51 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 3:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 3:10 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Thu May 24, 3:14 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 3:17 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 3:23 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Johannes Stezenbach
, (Thu May 24, 3:30 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 3:32 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 3:39 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 3:49 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 3:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Henrique de Moraes H ...
, (Thu May 24, 4:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 4:18 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu May 24, 4:19 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 5:37 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Thu May 24, 6:55 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 7:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Thu May 24, 7:20 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 7:41 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Thu May 24, 8:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 8:31 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Thu May 24, 9:33 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu May 24, 9:49 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ...
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Thu May 24, 10:12 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Thu May 24, 10:18 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Fri May 25, 1:52 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri May 25, 2:19 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Fri May 25, 2:22 am)
Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri May 25, 2:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Fri May 25, 4:44 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri May 25, 9:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun May 27, 8:57 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Sun May 27, 9:26 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun May 27, 9:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun May 27, 11:32 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun May 27, 11:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun May 27, 12:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun May 27, 6:05 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Mon May 28, 1:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon May 28, 3:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Mon May 28, 5:10 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon May 28, 5:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Mon May 28, 6:03 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon May 28, 6:06 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Mon May 28, 9:53 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Mon May 28, 3:53 pm)
Re: [stable] pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Mon May 28, 10:23 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Kay Sievers
, (Mon May 28, 11:55 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Tue May 29, 1:31 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Michael-Luke Jones
, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Tue May 29, 5:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue May 29, 6:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Kay Sievers
, (Tue May 29, 6:15 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Mark Lord
, (Tue May 29, 7:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Mark Lord
, (Tue May 29, 7:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue May 29, 7:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Tue May 29, 2:22 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue May 29, 2:33 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Tue May 29, 3:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Romano Giannetti
, (Wed May 30, 3:26 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Wed May 30, 4:49 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Wed May 30, 5:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Wed May 30, 6:17 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Wed May 30, 6:29 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Wed May 30, 7:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Wed May 30, 7:07 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Wed May 30, 7:08 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Wed May 30, 8:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Randy Dunlap
, (Wed May 30, 8:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed May 30, 9:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Wed May 30, 3:21 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Mel Gorman
Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmstat: remove zone->lock from walk_zones_in_node
Guenter Roeck
Re: [lm-sensors] Location for thermal drivers
David Woodhouse
Re: RFC: Moving firmware blobs out of the kernel.
Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU k...
Peter Zijlstra
Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear)
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MIPS] Fix potential latency problem due to non-atomic cpu_wait.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
USB: rename USB_SPEED_VARIABLE to USB_SPEED_WIRELESS
Linux Kernel Mailing List
lib/vsprintf.c: fix bug omitting minus sign of numbers (module_param)
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[Bluetooth] Initiate authentication during connection establishment
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[POWERPC] 4xx: Add ppc40x_defconfig
linux-netdev
:
MERCEDES
Your mail id has won 950,000.00 in the MERCEDES Benz Online Promo.for claims send:
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] xen/netfront: do not mark packets of length < MSS as GSO
David Miller
Re: skb_segment() questions
Shan Wei
[RFC PATCH net-next 2/5]IPv6:netfilter: Send an ICMPv6 "Fragment Reassembly Timeou...
Stanislaw Gruszka
[PATCH 1/4] bnx2x: use smp_mb() to keep ordering of read write operations
git
:
Nicolas Sebrecht
git-svn died of signal 11 (was "3 failures on test t9100 (svn)")
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only
Martin Langhoff
Re: [PATCH] GIT commit statistics.
Alexandre Julliard
[PATCH] gitweb: Put back shortlog instead of graphiclog in the project list.
Josh Triplett
[PATCH 2/2] Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only
openbsd-misc
:
Taisto Qvist XX
Re: AMD GEODE LX-800 just works with kernel from install42.iso and kernelpanics wi...
Nico Meijer
Re: gOS Develop Kit with VIA pc-1 Processor Platform VIA C7-D
Andreas Bihlmaier
Re: jetway board sensors (Fintek F71805F)
admin
Drive a 2009 car from R799p/m
Antti Harri
Re: how to create a sha256 hash
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate