login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
May
»
28
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Michael Buesch
Subject:
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
Date: Monday, May 28, 2007 - 8:14 am
On Monday 28 May 2007 16:09:46 Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
quoted text
> On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Can you give 2.6.16 a try? The diff is not that big and we might > > be able to find out what broke if you find out 2.6.16 works. > > You can also try later kernels like .17, .18, .19 to further > > reduce the patch. (You could also git-bisect, if you have the time). > > > I did some testing and compiled some kernels and here are the results: > > I was able to find out what causes the problems for me. I did build two > 2.6.21.3 kernels, and one does work fine and the other doesn't. > > This is a diff of the kernel configs I used: > > --- /usr/src/linux-2.6.21.3-oldconfig1/.config 2007-05-28 13:41:15.000000000 > +0200 > +++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.21.3/.config 2007-05-28 14:46:08.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > # > # Automatically generated make config: don't edit > # Linux kernel version: 2.6.21.3 > -# Mon May 28 13:41:15 2007 > +# Mon May 28 14:46:09 2007 > # > CONFIG_X86_32=y > CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ > # > # General setup > # > -CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-oldconfig1" > +CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="" > CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO=y > CONFIG_SWAP=y > CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y > @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ > # > # Processor type and features > # > -# CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT is not set > +CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y > # CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set > -# CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is not set > +CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y > # CONFIG_SMP is not set > CONFIG_X86_PC=y > # CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set > > The -oldconfig1 is the kernel that had no problems and the other shows the b44 > problem. So if High Resolution Timer Support is disabled everything works > fine and if I enable it the problems do appear again. > > I didn't test this on my 2.6.22-rc3 kernel yet, but I guess disabling High > Resolution Timer Support will also solve the problem there. > > The older kernels I tried also work perfectly fine and they didn't have the > High Resolution Timer Support yet.
So, that's interesting, indeed. Any idea what's going on, someone? Thomas? -- Greetings Michael. -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Sun May 27, 12:25 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Sun May 27, 12:45 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Sun May 27, 1:36 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Sun May 27, 1:46 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Sun May 27, 2:13 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Sun May 27, 2:16 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Sun May 27, 2:46 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Sun May 27, 2:50 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Sun May 27, 3:15 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Sun May 27, 5:24 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Sun May 27, 5:40 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Mon May 28, 3:16 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Mon May 28, 3:49 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Mon May 28, 7:09 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Mon May 28, 7:12 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Mon May 28, 7:55 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Mon May 28, 8:14 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Mon May 28, 8:32 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Mon May 28, 8:43 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Mon May 28, 10:44 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Mon May 28, 12:23 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Mon May 28, 1:55 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Mon May 28, 2:45 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Gary Zambrano
, (Tue May 29, 6:58 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Gary Zambrano
, (Tue May 29, 7:14 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Tue May 29, 10:23 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Tue May 29, 11:28 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Tue May 29, 1:45 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Stephen Hemminger
, (Tue May 29, 2:01 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Gary Zambrano
, (Tue May 29, 2:05 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Gary Zambrano
, (Tue May 29, 2:36 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue May 29, 3:39 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Michael Buesch
, (Wed May 30, 3:45 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Sun Jun 3, 9:26 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Sun Jun 3, 11:39 pm)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Stephen Hemminger
, (Mon Jun 4, 9:09 am)
Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Mon Jun 4, 9:35 am)
iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Stephen Hemminger
, (Mon Jun 4, 9:59 am)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Mon Jun 4, 10:32 am)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Stephen Hemminger
, (Mon Jun 4, 10:51 am)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Mon Jun 4, 12:00 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Mon Jun 4, 12:26 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Jun 4, 12:32 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Mon Jun 4, 12:47 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Stephen Hemminger
, (Mon Jun 4, 1:02 pm)
Re: iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?)
, Maximilian Engelhardt
, (Mon Jun 4, 1:52 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Paul Turner
[tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write
Mr. James W. Laferriere
Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc1 , syntax error near unexpected token `;'
Chuck Ebbert
Re: PCI: Unable to reserve mem region problem
Mingming Cao
Re: [RFC 1/4] Large Blocksize support for Ext2/3/4
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.34-rc4
git
:
Ralf Wildenhues
[PATCH] Fix typos in the documentation
Adeodato
Bazaar's patience diff as GIT_EXTERNAL_DIFF
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add functions get_relative_cwd() and is_inside_dir()
Len Brown
Re: fatal: unable to create '.git/index': File exists
Denis Bueno
Git clone error
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ASoC: fix registration of the SoC card in the Freescale MPC8610 drivers
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
Linux Kernel Mailing List
nfsd41: sanity check client drc maxreqs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
bnx2x: Moving includes
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB: gspca - sonixj: Adjust minor values of sensor ov7630. - set the color ga...
openbsd-misc
:
Sevan / Venture37
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Netmaffia.hu
Tini Lányok AKCIÓBAN OTTHON
Sam Fourman Jr.
Re: Help with Altell PC6700
Siju George
This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Darrin Chandler
Re: OT: Python (was Re: vi in /bin)
linux-netdev
:
Kurt Van Dijck
Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/2] can: add driver for Softing card
Eric Dumazet
Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Introduce skb_orphan_try()
Jamie Lokier
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa...
David Miller
Re: [PATCH v2] net: typos in comments in include/linux/igmp.h
Ursula Braun
[patch 0/1] remove header_ops bug in qeth driver
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate