Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review | KernelTrap

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...>

To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>

Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Romano Giannetti <romanol@...>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <stable@...>, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...>, Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@...>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@...>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...>, Dave Jones <davej@...>, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...>, Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...>, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...>, <akpm@...>, <alan@...>

Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

Date: Monday, May 28, 2007 - 9:03 am

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 02:55:07PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:

quoted text> Well, PPC people are aware of this, and they think they can fix the
> drivers. We probably want to drop the freezer for suspend long-term,
> so. PPC machines use small subset of all the drivers, so it apparently
> is not big problem for them.

I'm fairly certain that PPC uses USB. In any case, it's not limited to 
PPC - APM has the same issue. Any driver that assumes processes will be 
frozen during suspend to RAM is broken now, not the future.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 6:07 pm)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 8:06 am)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 12:16 pm)

pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 4:04 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:27 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 5:03 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:00 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:10 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:23 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:39 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:32 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Thu May 24, 7:16 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 7:19 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 7:44 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:17 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:53 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 11:57 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 27, 12:26 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 6:04 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 28, 12:53 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue May 29, 9:04 am)

Re: [stable] pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69]..., Greg KH, (Tue May 29, 1:23 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 12:43 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 2:32 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 2:44 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 9:05 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 4:11 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 8:10 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 8:55 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 9:03 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 9:06 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Mon May 28, 6:53 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 3:09 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Romano Giannetti, (Tue May 29, 4:31 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 10:55 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 30, 6:26 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Randy Dunlap, (Wed May 30, 11:43 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 7:18 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:37 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Kay Sievers, (Tue May 29, 2:55 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 8:00 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 8:00 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Kay Sievers, (Tue May 29, 9:15 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 8:16 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 5:19 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 9:55 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 10:10 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:20 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 10:41 pm)

Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second h..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 5:40 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 11:00 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:31 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Fri May 25, 12:33 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 10:19 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 5:22 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 5:33 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 7:49 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 8:40 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 11:43 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 9:17 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 10:04 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 6:21 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 10:07 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 9:29 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 10:08 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 30, 12:00 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 6:10 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 25, 12:49 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 10:16 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Fri May 25, 1:18 am)

Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stable..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 11:06 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:28 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:52 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 4:21 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:33 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:35 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:36 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 6:14 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:49 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 5:22 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 25, 12:19 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 4:52 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 4:14 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 5:01 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Sam Ravnborg, (Thu May 24, 5:12 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 5:21 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Sam Ravnborg, (Fri May 25, 1:12 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:51 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 6:30 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:28 pm)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 3:09 am)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 3:19 am)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 3:38 am)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Greg KH	[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Alan Cox	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Andrew Morton	2.6.23-rc6-mm1
jjohansen	[AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
git:

linux-netdev:
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Linus Torvalds	Re: [GIT]: Networking
Mark Lord	Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 608 guests online.

Syndicate