On 28 May 2007, at 13:09, Nitin Gupta wrote:

quoted text
>> This means:
>> 1) Options in lib/Kconfig hidden (selectable by drivers as required)
>
> LZO as hidden option has no practical sense. Although LZO should be
> auto-selected when some dependent project is selected (e.g. reieser4)
> - there should be separate patch for this. Mixing such changes with
> 'core' LZO patch will just add side noise.

No, LZO as a visible option makes no practical sense. Why would  
anyone want to build LZO into a kernel when there are no in-kernel  
users of the code?

In fact, all of the library code should probably go this way...

Michael-Luke Jones

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/