On Sat, 26 May 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

quoted text
> +Testing for a flag, as done in the following example, is redundant and
> +can be shortened.
> +
> +	if ((v & GFP_KERNEL) == GFP_KERNEL)
> +		return;
> +
> +should become
> +
> +	if (v & GFP_KERNEL)
> +		return;

This looks wrong to me. These two are only equivalent if the "flag" only 
has 1 bit. And already here you fall into this trap:

#define GFP_KERNEL	(__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO | __GFP_FS)

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/