Hi Richard,

On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie <richard@openedhand.com> wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:15 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> > Richard, can you please provide perf. results for this patch also?
> > Also, can you please mail back latest version of your LZO patch? In
> > meantime, I will try to include benchmarking support to the
> > 'compress-test' module.
>
> This version is 15% slower at decompression and about equal on
> compression.

I hope you tested your _safe variant against this, Nitin has done away
with the _unsafe version in this patch. Also, are you using your crypto
lzo-support + tcrypt changes ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/1/303 ) to
benchmark these?

quoted text
> I am however still strongly of the opinion that we should just use the
> version in -mm (which is my latest version).

Right, if the difference is anything >10%, code cleanup does lose
its attractiveness.

Satyam
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/