Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Friday, May 25, 2007 - 2:40 am

Hi!


And what do you expect? We have three people working on
hibernation, and suspend-to-ram was created as "oh, if we do this,
this, and this, we get get suspend-to-ram with existing code".


You'd be seriously overstaffed in FPU side, and seriously understaffed
on ALU side.

This is basically what happened here. I tell people to get hibernation
to work _first_ because it is usually easier.

And what does that mean? We need three people to work on
suspend-to-RAM. Heck, we need at least _one_ person to work on
suspend-to-RAM, but he needs to be listed in MAINTAINERS.

With hibernation people trying to maintain suspend in their spare
cycles, how do you expect suspend to work? Similar to hibernation,
that's how it looks today.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 12:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:06 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 9:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 3:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 3:30 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Thu May 24, 4:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:18 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 1:52 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 2:22 am)
Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second ..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 2:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 4:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 11:32 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 12:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 1:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:08 am)