Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » May » 25

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>
Cc: Romano Giannetti <romanol@...>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <stable@...>, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...>, Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@...>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@...>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...>, Dave Jones <davej@...>, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...>, Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...>, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...>, <akpm@...>, <alan@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
Date: Thursday, May 24, 2007 - 8:37 pm

On Fri, 25 May 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:

And people aren't listening. Have you thought about _why_?

The thing is, it should just work. Even without pre-loading.


Don't be silly. We solved it. The firmware has to be loadable from 
somewhere else, since otherwise his IDE card wouldn't have been accessible 
in the first place! 

So all your arguments are just bogus crap.

			Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 6:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 8:06 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 12:16 pm)
pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 4:04 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:27 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 5:03 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:23 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:39 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:32 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Thu May 24, 7:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 7:19 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 7:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:17 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 11:57 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 27, 12:26 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 6:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 28, 12:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue May 29, 9:04 am)
Re: [stable] pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69]..., Greg KH, (Tue May 29, 1:23 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 12:43 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 2:32 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 2:44 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 9:05 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 4:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 8:10 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 8:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 9:03 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 9:06 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Mon May 28, 6:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 3:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Romano Giannetti, (Tue May 29, 4:31 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 10:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 30, 6:26 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Randy Dunlap, (Wed May 30, 11:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 7:18 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:37 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Kay Sievers, (Tue May 29, 2:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 8:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 8:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Kay Sievers, (Tue May 29, 9:15 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 8:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 5:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 9:55 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 10:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:20 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 10:41 pm)
Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second h..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 5:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 11:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:31 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Fri May 25, 12:33 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 10:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 5:22 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 5:33 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 7:49 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 8:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 11:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 9:17 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 10:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 6:21 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 10:07 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 9:29 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 10:08 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 30, 12:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 6:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 25, 12:49 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 10:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Fri May 25, 1:18 am)
Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stable..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 11:06 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:28 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:52 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 4:21 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:33 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:35 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:36 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 6:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:49 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 5:22 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 25, 12:19 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 4:52 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 4:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 5:01 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Sam Ravnborg, (Thu May 24, 5:12 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 5:21 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Sam Ravnborg, (Fri May 25, 1:12 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:51 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 6:30 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:28 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 3:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 3:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 3:38 am)