Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review | KernelTrap

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@...>

To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Romano Giannetti <romanol@...>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <stable@...>, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...>, Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@...>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@...>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...>, Dave Jones <davej@...>, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...>, Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...>, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...>, <akpm@...>, <alan@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>

Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

Date: Thursday, May 24, 2007 - 7:16 pm

On Fri, 25 May 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
quoted text> My proposed solution is "fix pcmcia to load firmware before suspend
> even starts"

s/pcmcia/all drivers that load firmware/ if you are going to go that way.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 6:07 pm)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 8:06 am)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 12:16 pm)

pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 4:04 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:27 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 5:03 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:00 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:10 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:23 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:39 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:32 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Thu May 24, 7:16 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 7:19 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 7:44 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 6:17 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:53 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 11:57 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 27, 12:26 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 6:04 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 28, 12:53 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue May 29, 9:04 am)

Re: [stable] pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69]..., Greg KH, (Tue May 29, 1:23 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 12:43 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 2:32 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 2:44 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 9:05 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 4:11 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 8:10 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 8:55 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 9:03 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 9:06 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Mon May 28, 6:53 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 3:09 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Romano Giannetti, (Tue May 29, 4:31 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 10:55 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 30, 6:26 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Randy Dunlap, (Wed May 30, 11:43 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 7:18 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:37 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Kay Sievers, (Tue May 29, 2:55 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 8:00 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 8:00 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Kay Sievers, (Tue May 29, 9:15 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 8:16 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 5:19 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 9:55 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 10:10 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:20 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 10:41 pm)

Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second h..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 5:40 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 11:00 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:31 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Fri May 25, 12:33 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 10:19 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 5:22 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 5:33 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 7:49 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 8:40 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 11:43 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 9:17 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 10:04 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 6:21 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 10:07 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 9:29 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 10:08 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 30, 12:00 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 6:10 pm)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 25, 12:49 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 10:16 am)

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Fri May 25, 1:18 am)

Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stable..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 11:06 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:28 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 11:52 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 4:21 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:33 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 4:35 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:36 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 6:14 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 6:49 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 5:22 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 25, 12:19 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-st..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 4:52 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 4:14 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 5:01 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Sam Ravnborg, (Thu May 24, 5:12 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 5:21 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Sam Ravnborg, (Fri May 25, 1:12 am)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:51 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 6:30 pm)

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -st..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:28 pm)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 3:09 am)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 3:19 am)

Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 3:38 am)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Greg KH	Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
Greg KH	[patch 26/73] NET: Correct two mistaken skb_reset_mac_header() conversions.
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt
Alan Cox	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
git:

linux-netdev:
Alexey Dobriyan	Re: [GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Andrew Morton	Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Who's online

There are currently 7 users and 1197 guests online.

Online users

Syndicate