Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thursday, May 24, 2007 - 2:01 pm

On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:14:08 +0200
Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com> wrote:


ntfs is being naughty.

--- a/fs/ntfs/Makefile~a
+++ a/fs/ntfs/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ntfs-objs := aops.o attrib.o collate.o c
 	     index.o inode.o mft.o mst.o namei.o runlist.o super.o sysctl.o \
 	     unistr.o upcase.o
 
-EXTRA_CFLAGS = -DNTFS_VERSION=\"2.1.28\"
+EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DNTFS_VERSION=\"2.1.28\"
 
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_NTFS_DEBUG),y)
 EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DDEBUG
_


akpm:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22-rc2> grep -r EXTRA_CFLAGS . | fgrep '+=' | wc -l 
131
akpm:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22-rc2> grep -r EXTRA_CFLAGS . | fgrep -v '+=' | wc -l 
55

hm, lots of Makefiles commit the same sin.  Sam, is this as busted as
I think it is?
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 12:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:06 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 9:16 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 2:01 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 3:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 3:30 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Thu May 24, 4:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:18 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 1:52 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 2:22 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 4:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 11:32 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 12:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 1:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:08 am)