Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » May » 24

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Linus Torvalds
Subject: Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)
Date: Thursday, May 24, 2007 - 1:35 pm

On Thu, 24 May 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

Btw, to solve the 60-second timeout problem, do you actually _need_ to 
have CONFIG_PCMCIA_LOAD_CIS enabled for those cards to work for you? Quite 
likely that's the "firmware" that screws up for you, and it's also not 
totally unlikely that you don't even need it.

			Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 12:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:06 am)
Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stab ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 8:06 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:28 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:52 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 9:16 am)
pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 1:04 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 1:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 1:21 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 1:27 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 1:33 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 1:35 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 2:01 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Sam Ravnborg, (Thu May 24, 2:12 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Andrew Morton, (Thu May 24, 2:21 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 2:28 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 2:36 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 2:51 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 3:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 3:10 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 3:14 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 3:17 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 3:23 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 3:30 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 3:32 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 3:39 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 3:49 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 3:53 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Thu May 24, 4:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 4:18 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu May 24, 4:19 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 5:37 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 6:55 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 7:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 7:20 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 7:41 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 8:00 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 8:31 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 9:33 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 9:49 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Sam Ravnborg, (Thu May 24, 10:12 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:18 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 1:52 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 2:19 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 2:22 am)
Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second ..., Pavel Machek, (Fri May 25, 2:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 4:44 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 25, 9:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 8:57 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 27, 9:26 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 9:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 11:32 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 11:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 12:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Sun May 27, 6:05 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 1:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 3:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 5:10 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 5:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 28, 6:03 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon May 28, 6:06 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 28, 9:53 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Mon May 28, 3:53 pm)
Re: [stable] pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/6 ..., Greg KH, (Mon May 28, 10:23 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Kay Sievers, (Mon May 28, 11:55 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Romano Giannetti, (Tue May 29, 1:31 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue May 29, 6:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Kay Sievers, (Tue May 29, 6:15 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 7:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Mark Lord, (Tue May 29, 7:19 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 7:55 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 2:22 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 29, 2:33 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 29, 3:10 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 30, 3:26 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 4:49 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 5:40 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 6:17 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 6:29 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed May 30, 7:07 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:08 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed May 30, 8:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Randy Dunlap, (Wed May 30, 8:43 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 30, 9:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Wed May 30, 3:21 pm)