Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Romano Giannetti
Date: Thursday, May 24, 2007 - 1:14 pm

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:


Compiling now. I had lost a lot of time because at first try it stopped
in ntfs:

  CC [M]  fs/ntfs/super.o
fs/ntfs/super.c: In function ‘init_ntfs_fs’:
fs/ntfs/super.c:3152: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘NTFS_VERSION’
fs/ntfs/super.c: At top level:
fs/ntfs/super.c:3262: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘NTFS_VERSION’
make[2]: *** [fs/ntfs/super.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/ntfs] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2
  
I suppose because NTFS_VERSION were defined as EXTRA_CFLAGS too in the Makefile, 
and I corrected it adding a fake #define NTFS_VERSION in super.c. Then I
got to a meeting, and coming back:
  
  CC [M]  fs/xfs/quota/xfs_dquot.o
fs/xfs/quota/xfs_dquot.c:18:17: error: xfs.h: No such file or directory
fs/xfs/quota/xfs_dquot.c:19:20: error: xfs_fs.h: No such file or directory
fs/xfs/quota/xfs_dquot.c:20:21: error: xfs_bit.h: No such file or directory
fs/xfs/quota/xfs_dquot.c:21:21: error: xfs_log.h: No such file or directory

So I gave up and lost^Wused a couple of hours trimming  down .config, and 
now it's compiling.

Romano


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Paolo Ornati, (Wed May 23, 12:19 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 5:06 am)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 24, 9:16 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 1:14 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Thu May 24, 3:14 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] - ..., Johannes Stezenbach, (Thu May 24, 3:30 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Thu May 24, 4:16 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Thu May 24, 10:18 pm)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 1:52 am)
Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]- ..., Romano Giannetti, (Fri May 25, 2:22 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri May 25, 4:44 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 11:32 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun May 27, 12:09 pm)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon May 28, 1:11 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Michael-Luke Jones, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:00 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 29, 5:16 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:04 am)
Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stabl ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 30, 7:08 am)