Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Monday, May 21, 2007 - 3:20 pm

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

If only it would fix all of them...

Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in
2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before
2.6.21 was released).

cu
Adrian

[1] http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions [2]
[2] the 2.6.21 regressions are listed after the 28 known 2.6.22-rc 
    regressions

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 00/69] -stable review, Chris Wright, (Mon May 21, 12:16 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 21, 12:31 pm)
Re: [stable] [patch 00/69] -stable review, Chris Wright, (Mon May 21, 1:31 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon May 21, 1:54 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 21, 2:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Chris Wright, (Mon May 21, 2:25 pm)
Re: [stable] [patch 00/69] -stable review, Eric Dumazet, (Mon May 21, 2:38 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Chris Wright, (Mon May 21, 2:40 pm)
Re: [stable] [patch 00/69] -stable review, Chris Wright, (Mon May 21, 3:13 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Adrian Bunk, (Mon May 21, 3:20 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon May 21, 3:23 pm)
Re: [stable] [patch 00/69] -stable review, Chris Wright, (Mon May 21, 3:35 pm)
Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review, Romano Giannetti, (Wed May 23, 12:15 am)