Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Dike
Date: Monday, May 21, 2007 - 2:03 pm

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:49:38AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:

No, I don't.  The bug_table symbols are rather unconditionally defined
in asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.  This can't be affected by any config
settings that I can see, let alone module support.  Further, the
config I always build has modules enabled, and I've never seen this.

Can you try starting over with an mrproper and see if you can
reproduce it?

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21, Robert Schwebel, (Wed May 16, 3:49 pm)
Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21, Rob Landley, (Wed May 16, 6:11 pm)
Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21, Robert Schwebel, (Thu May 17, 2:05 pm)
Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21, Robert Schwebel, (Thu May 17, 2:12 pm)
Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21, Rob Landley, (Fri May 18, 12:25 am)
Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21, Jeff Dike, (Mon May 21, 2:03 pm)