login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
May
»
18
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Stefan Richter
Subject:
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 - 7:00 am
Peter Jones wrote:
quoted text
> So really, either way means we need to update the tools. It also > doesn't really solve the problem -- when I insert "usb-storage", the > SCSI scan may still finish while we're still enumerating the bus for USB > devices. (I'd be willing to believe I'm wrong about this specific > example, but I suspect the principle still applies for some other driver.) > > In practice, we wind up doing the compare/timeout loop as on > /proc/scsi/scsi, but on /proc/bus/usb/devices or > /sys/bus/ieee1394/drivers/sbp2 instead.
sbp2 and its successor fw-sbp2 are not yet integrated with scsi_wait_scan, but should be _some_ day.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3225#c2
-- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-= =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 8:22 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Sun May 13, 8:58 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:06 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:10 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:18 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 9:20 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:27 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:28 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:30 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 9:37 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 10:42 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 10:48 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 11:26 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 11:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 11:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 1:38 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 2:35 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 2:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:00 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:23 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Mon May 14, 7:31 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Mon May 14, 10:29 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Alan Cox
, (Mon May 14, 11:46 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Mon May 14, 1:06 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:41 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Tue May 15, 4:26 am)
Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 5:02 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Simon Arlott
, (Tue May 15, 9:30 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 10:29 am)
[PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Stefan Richter
, (Tue May 15, 2:56 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue May 15, 4:27 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Tue May 15, 4:28 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue May 15, 4:49 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 7:51 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Roland Dreier
, (Tue May 15, 7:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Stefan Richter
, (Wed May 16, 7:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, James Bottomley
, (Thu May 17, 7:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:02 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:13 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 10:20 am)
sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 10:32 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:41 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, James Bottomley
, (Thu May 17, 10:45 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 10:49 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Thu May 17, 11:24 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 11:47 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Thu May 17, 11:51 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 12:04 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 12:39 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 12:43 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 2:30 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Dave Jones
, (Thu May 17, 2:42 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Peter Jones
, (Thu May 17, 3:00 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Peter Jones
, (Thu May 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 8:41 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:28 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri May 18, 4:19 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri May 18, 4:24 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri May 18, 6:06 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri May 18, 6:14 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Stefan Richter
, (Fri May 18, 7:00 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Greg KH
, (Sat May 19, 9:30 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ingo Molnar
Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
Vivek Goyal
[PATCH] x86_64: Display more intutive error message if kernel is not 2MB aligned
Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [0/35] Some x86 2.6.22 candidate patches for review
Andrew Morton
Re: [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE 2/2
Peter Zijlstra
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Marker probes in futex.c
git
:
Felipe Contreras
Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
Johannes Schindelin
[PATCH] fetch: refuse to fetch into the current branch in a non-bare repository
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Fix install-doc-quick target
Peter Oberndorfer
Subject: [PATCH] fix stg edit command
Nicolas Pitre
Re: About git and the use of SHA-1
linux-netdev
:
Ursula Braun
[patch 2/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: sync sk shutdown flag if iucv path is quiesced
David Dillow
Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts
Andi Kleen
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Paul E. McKenney
Re: [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Introduce hlist_nulls variant of hlist
Russell King
Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh: Fix compile error by operands(mov.l) in sh3/entry.S
Linux Kernel Mailing List
New device ID for sc92031 [1088:2031]
Linux Kernel Mailing List
e1000e: Expose MDI-X status via ethtool change
Linux Kernel Mailing List
powerpc/kexec: Add support for FSL-BookE
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
openbsd-misc
:
Andres Salazar
About priorities in /etc/resolv.conf
Rob Shepherd
x86 hardware for router system
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Mitja Muženič
Re: isakmpd -- NCP IPsec client: peer proposed invalid phase 2 IDs
Damien Miller
Re: Patching a SSH 'Weakness'
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate