On 5/18/07, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:11:58AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > It's also somewhat a matter of *taste* (and hence subjective), if you
> > _still_ don't get it, Matthew, then there's no point continuing this thread
> > and trying to convince you ad infinitum.
>
> Right.  It's a matter of taste.  What makes you think you have taste?

Well, my stand uptil now has been to consider as many options as
possible. I have certainly not married myself to just one particular way
of doing this -- but I bet that the one way that I do _dislike_, the dummy
module one, would not be found tasteful / best by most people around
(yourself included, as you say).

quoted text
> I don't think that the module solution is perfect.  But abusing the
> module parameters is a worse idea.  sysfs just isn't a good fit for this,
> according to my taste.

The whole point is to at least _consider_ other alternatives. And I've
found your attitude so far to have been extremely blocking / difficult.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/