login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@...>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...>, James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...>, Dave Jones <davej@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-scsi@...>, <kernel-packagers@...>
Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 - 1:28 am

On 5/18/07, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:

[ BTW, this is the last time I'll try explaining this to you. ]

The one-line patch you're suggesting *would*not*allow* one to use the async
scanning _at_all_. If one really wants to use async scanning reliably (even in
the future, as it can be turned on at boot-time later, like you very well know),
that module *must* be built. Making it user-visible and/or optional would *not*
be a solution but a *problem*. What I have been suggesting is *not* to make
this *dummy module* user-visible and/or optional but to _not_ use this
*dummy module* for this purpose in the first place.

[ There. What was this ... third ... fourth time? ]


[ This time, I don't see the subject changing, nor a "change in the general
direction of the thread blah blah blah", and still you feel compelled to not
maintain the CC list. Wow. ]
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?, Robert P. J. Day, (Sun May 13, 11:22 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely mod..., Robert P. J. Day, (Sun May 13, 12:20 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely mod..., Robert P. J. Day, (Sun May 13, 12:37 pm)
Asynchronous scsi scanning, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 15, 8:02 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Peter Jones, (Thu May 17, 6:24 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Simon Arlott, (Tue May 15, 12:30 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 15, 1:29 pm)
[PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built, Stefan Richter, (Tue May 15, 5:56 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Tue May 15, 7:27 pm)
sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Benjamin LaHaise, (Thu May 17, 1:32 pm)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, James Bottomley, (Thu May 17, 1:45 pm)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Benjamin LaHaise, (Thu May 17, 1:49 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 15, 10:51 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Thu May 17, 1:13 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu May 17, 1:20 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Thu May 17, 1:41 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Christoph Hellwig, (Thu May 17, 2:24 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Thu May 17, 2:47 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Christoph Hellwig, (Thu May 17, 2:51 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Thu May 17, 3:04 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu May 17, 3:39 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Benjamin LaHaise, (Thu May 17, 3:43 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Thu May 17, 11:41 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri May 18, 7:19 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Fri May 18, 9:06 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu May 17, 5:30 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Fri May 18, 1:28 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri May 18, 7:24 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Fri May 18, 9:14 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Dave Jones, (Thu May 17, 5:42 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Peter Jones, (Thu May 17, 6:00 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 18, 10:00 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Roland Dreier, (Tue May 15, 10:59 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue May 15, 7:28 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, Satyam Sharma, (Tue May 15, 7:49 pm)
speck-geostationary