login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
May
»
17
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Christoph Hellwig
Subject:
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
Date: Thursday, May 17, 2007 - 11:51 am
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:17:40AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
quoted text
> However, Ben does have a point that we shouldn't force those > using SCSI (and wishing to use the new async scanning > feature) to depend on and use sysfs too
yes, we do. an no, procfs is a much worse filesystem to depend on for drivers. if people don't want sysfs they can either do the synchronous scan or do their own scan in userspace. -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 8:22 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Sun May 13, 8:58 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:06 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:10 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:18 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 9:20 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:27 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:28 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:30 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 9:37 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 10:42 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 10:48 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 11:26 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 11:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 11:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 1:38 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 2:35 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 2:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:00 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:23 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Mon May 14, 7:31 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Mon May 14, 10:29 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Alan Cox
, (Mon May 14, 11:46 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Mon May 14, 1:06 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:41 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Tue May 15, 4:26 am)
Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 5:02 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Simon Arlott
, (Tue May 15, 9:30 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 10:29 am)
[PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Stefan Richter
, (Tue May 15, 2:56 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue May 15, 4:27 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Tue May 15, 4:28 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue May 15, 4:49 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 7:51 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Roland Dreier
, (Tue May 15, 7:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Stefan Richter
, (Wed May 16, 7:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, James Bottomley
, (Thu May 17, 7:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:02 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:13 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 10:20 am)
sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 10:32 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:41 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, James Bottomley
, (Thu May 17, 10:45 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 10:49 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Thu May 17, 11:24 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 11:47 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Thu May 17, 11:51 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 12:04 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 12:39 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 12:43 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 2:30 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Dave Jones
, (Thu May 17, 2:42 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Peter Jones
, (Thu May 17, 3:00 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Peter Jones
, (Thu May 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 8:41 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:28 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri May 18, 4:19 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri May 18, 4:24 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri May 18, 6:06 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri May 18, 6:14 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Stefan Richter
, (Fri May 18, 7:00 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Greg KH
, (Sat May 19, 9:30 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ken Chen
[patch] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cpu tg->cfs_rq shares.
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH v3] x86: merge the simple bitops and move them to bitops.h
Paul Turner
[tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write
Andi Kleen
Re: - romsignature-checksum-cleanup-2.patch removed from -mm tree
Petr Tesarik
Re: Serious problem with ticket spinlocks on ia64
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: Teach "git checkout" to use git-show-ref
Christian Jaeger
Re: Problem with Git.pm bidi_pipe methods
Linus Torvalds
[PATCH 1/7] Make unpack_trees_options bit flags actual bitfields
Jon Smirl
stgit: managing signed-off-by lines
Han-Wen Nienhuys
Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: Bonito64: Make Loongson independent from Bonito64 code.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
iwlwifi: initialize spinlock before use
Linux Kernel Mailing List
i2c-i801: Add Intel Cougar Point device IDs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drm/i915: Add information on pinning and fencing to the i915 list debug.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ALSA: hda - Clean up quirks for HP laptops with AD1984A
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
v2 [PATCH 1/4] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Richard Cochran
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ptp: Added a clock that uses the eTSEC found on the MPC85xx.
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
[PATCH 40/40] wimax/i2400m: add CREDITS and MAINTAINERS entries
Sathya Perla
[PATCH net-next-2.6] be2net: add multiple RX queue support
Changli Gao
Re: [PATCH 3/3] ifb: move tq from ifb_private
freebsd-current
:
Boris Samorodov
Re: twa + dump = sbwait
韓家標 Bill Hacker
Re: ZFS honesty
Bjoern A. Zeeb
Re: Can not boot 7.0-BETA3 with IPSEC
rmgls
man usb2_core(4)
Sam Leffler
Re: Lots of "ath0: bad series0 hwrate 0x1b" in 8.0-BETA2
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate