Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Woodhouse
Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 - 5:09 am

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 11:19 +0100, David Howells wrote:

Really? Is it _really_ going to be modified? Even if the pointer
userspace gave to write() is bogus, and is going to fault half-way
through the copy_from_user()?

-- 
dwmw2

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, David Chinner, (Sun Mar 18, 4:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, David Chinner, (Mon Mar 19, 1:12 am)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Mar 19, 2:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Mar 19, 5:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, David Howells, (Wed May 16, 3:19 am)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, David Woodhouse, (Wed May 16, 5:09 am)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, David Howells, (Wed May 16, 6:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, David Howells, (Wed May 16, 6:25 am)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2, David Chinner, (Wed May 16, 4:28 pm)