login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
May
»
15
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Arjan van de Ven
Subject:
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
Date: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 - 4:28 pm
Satyam Sharma wrote:
quoted text
>> > >semantics of it (read-only? read-write? write-only? > > Well, it _has_ to be write, don't really care if it's read-write or > write-only. I would still prefer read-write, but we can go ahead with > write-only too. It doesn't really matter, does it?
just to be devils advocate... it should be a read that returns when done, and that can be polled -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 8:22 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Sun May 13, 8:58 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:06 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:10 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:18 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 9:20 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 9:27 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:28 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 9:30 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Robert P. J. Day
, (Sun May 13, 9:37 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 10:42 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 10:48 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 11:26 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Dave Jones
, (Sun May 13, 11:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun May 13, 11:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun May 13, 1:38 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 2:35 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 2:45 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:00 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:23 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, James Bottomley
, (Mon May 14, 7:31 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Mon May 14, 10:29 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Alan Cox
, (Mon May 14, 11:46 am)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Mon May 14, 1:06 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Satyam Sharma
, (Mon May 14, 5:41 pm)
Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely m ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Tue May 15, 4:26 am)
Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 5:02 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Simon Arlott
, (Tue May 15, 9:30 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 10:29 am)
[PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Stefan Richter
, (Tue May 15, 2:56 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue May 15, 4:27 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Tue May 15, 4:28 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue May 15, 4:49 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue May 15, 7:51 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Roland Dreier
, (Tue May 15, 7:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Stefan Richter
, (Wed May 16, 7:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, James Bottomley
, (Thu May 17, 7:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:02 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:13 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 10:20 am)
sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 10:32 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:41 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, James Bottomley
, (Thu May 17, 10:45 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 10:49 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Thu May 17, 11:24 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 11:47 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Thu May 17, 11:51 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 12:04 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 12:39 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Benjamin LaHaise
, (Thu May 17, 12:43 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu May 17, 2:30 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Dave Jones
, (Thu May 17, 2:42 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Peter Jones
, (Thu May 17, 3:00 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Peter Jones
, (Thu May 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 8:41 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Thu May 17, 10:28 pm)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri May 18, 4:19 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri May 18, 4:24 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri May 18, 6:06 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri May 18, 6:14 am)
Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Stefan Richter
, (Fri May 18, 7:00 am)
Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
, Greg KH
, (Sat May 19, 9:30 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2.6.21.5 june 30th to july 1st date hang?
Jeff Dike
[ PATCH 2/6 ] UML - Formatting fixes around os_{read_write}_file callers
Liam Girdwood
[PATCH 07/13] regulator: regulator test harness
Oleg Nesterov
Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
Stefan Seyfried
Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18
linux-netdev
:
Arnaud Ebalard
Re: [REGRESSION,BISECTED] MIPv6 support broken by f4f914b58019f0
Jan Engelhardt
Re: [PATCH iptables] extension: add xt_cpu match
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[PATCH 8/8] net/emergency: remove locking from reycling pool if emergncy pools are...
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] qlcnic: dont assume NET_IP_ALIGN is 2
git
:
Jakub Narebski
Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Brandon Casey
Re: Thunderbird and patches (was Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the def...
Christian Couder
[PATCH 1/3] rev-parse: add test script for "--verify"
Ramkumar Ramachandra
Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: The final one
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add
openbsd-misc
:
Joachim Schipper
Re: UVC Webcams
Florin Andrei
SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong]
Todd Alan Smith
Re: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
Neal Hogan
Re: Need Advice: Thinkpad T60 or T61?
Sam Fourman Jr.
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ACPI: Disable ARB_DISABLE on platforms where it is not needed
Linux Kernel Mailing List
m68knommu: add read_barrier_depends() and irqs_disabled_flags()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MTD] Add mtd panic_write function pointer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] pxa: remove duplicate select statements from Kconfig
Linux Kernel Mailing List
mlx4_core: Don't read reserved fields in mlx4_QUERY_ADAPTER()
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate