Re: [PATCH 1/2] non-string based tsc unstable reasons

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>, <johnstul@...>, <mingo@...>
Date: Saturday, May 12, 2007 - 2:56 pm

On Saturday 12 May 2007 17:43:45 Daniel Walker wrote:

This seems ugly -- it would be better to just do whatever needs to
be doing in the caller instead of passing down a enum and then switch.

And why do you really need it anyways?

-Andi
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/2] non-string based tsc unstable reasons, Daniel Walker, (Sat May 12, 11:43 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] non-string based tsc unstable reasons, Andi Kleen, (Sat May 12, 2:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] non-string based tsc unstable reasons, Daniel Walker, (Sat May 12, 3:10 pm)