On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:11 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:00:12AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > hrtimer_forward() does not check for the possible overflow of
> > timer->expires. This can happen on 64 bit machines with large interval
> > values and results currently in an endless loop in the softirq because
> > the expiry value becomes negative and therefor the timer is expired all
> > the time.
> > 
> > Check for this condition and set the expiry value to the max. expiry
> > time in the future.
> > 
> > The fix should be applied to stable kernel series as well.
> 
> 
> Is this relevant for 2.6.16?
> 
> I'm asking since KTIME_SEC_MAX is not used in 2.6.16, and therefore the 
> check in ktime_set() is also missing.

KTIME_SEC_MAX was introduced with commit
96dd7421a06a5bc6eb731323b95efcb2fd864854

to fix a conversion problem on 64 bit machines, which is also present in
2.6.16 AFAICT.

The patch just makes use of this constant. So you need to pull it as
well.

	tglx


-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/