On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 01:33:16PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
OK, how do you suggest to track bugs in a way that doesn't suck?
Bug reports to linux-kernel have the big problem that they are lost if
no developer immediately picks them up.
What I do know is that the majority of them has never been proper
debugged by a kernel developer knowing the subsystem in question.
I tracked 2.6.21-rc regressions, and I do not scale for higher numbers
of bugs. When I had to track 36 known regressions it was a real
nightmare.
Bugzilla tracks regressions and scales for higher numbers of bugs.
Let me ask you two questions:
- Do you think regression tracking makes any sense at all?
- If yes, which scalable way of regression tracking would in your
opinion not suck?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-