Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Lang <david.lang@...>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Josh Triplett <josh@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, April 28, 2007 - 9:04 pm

On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:15:50PM -0700, David Lang wrote:


This would be ideal (and it's broadly what the OLPC guys are aiming for, 
I think), but on most platforms you're looking at at least a second or 
so to resume. As far as I know, we're still looking at ~60 ticks a 
second at best for an average desktop, so that's not going to be a win.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and sus..., Matthew Garrett, (Sat Apr 28, 9:04 pm)