On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:Ehh.. Why do you thik we _have_ that PF_NOFREEZE thing in the first place? Rafael, you really don't know what you're talking about, do you? Just _look_ at them. It's the IO threads etc that shouldn't be frozen, exactly *because* they do IO. You claim that kernel threads shouldn't do IO, but that's the point: if you cannot do IO when snapshotting to disk, here's a damn big clue for you: how do you think that snapshot is going to get written? I *guarantee* you that we've had a lot more problems with threads that should *not* have been frozen than with those hypothetical threads that you think should have been frozen. Linus -
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Zhang, Yanmin | AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
