On Saturday, 28 April 2007 18:28, Linus Torvalds wrote:xfssyncd , or at least it seems so at a quick look. I can't remember anything like this, but I believe you have a specific test case in mind. Well, they may be bogus, but there's something else. I have reviewed some kernel threads used by device drivers that currently are frozen to see if it would be safe not to freeze them, and I'm worried. What, for example, if such a thread schedules a timeout and waits for something to happen (eg. the airo driver does something like this), but instead the hibernation/suspend happens and the device is frozen/suspended under it? Shouldn't the thread be notified by the driver's freeze/suspend callback? Moreover, what if after the restore the device is not present (for example, it may be a pcmcia card that the user has removed) and the thread is scheduled before the device's unfreeze callback has a chance to run? Shouldn't the thread check that the device is present? In that case it would have to be notified by someone that the check is necessary, but who can do that? Greetings, Rafael -
| Zhang, Yanmin | AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 |
| Con Kolivas | [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 |
| Nick Piggin | [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear) |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
