On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text
> 
> The "let's stop all kernel threads" is superstition. It's the same kind of 
> superstition that made people write "sync" three times before turning off 
> the power in the olden times. It's the kind of superstition that comes 
> from "we don't do things right, so let's be vewy vewy quiet and _pray_ 
> that it works when we are beign quiet".

Side note: while I think things should probably *work* even with user 
processes going full bore while a snapshot it taken, I'll freely admit 
that I'll follow that superstition far enough that I think it's probably a 
good idea to try to quiesce the system to _some_ degree, and that stopping 
user programs is a good idea. Partly because the whole memory shrinking 
thing, and partly just because we should do the snapshot with hw IO queues 
empty.

But I don't think it would necessarily be wrong (and in many ways it would 
probably be *right*) to do that IO queue stopping at the queue level 
rather than at a process level. Why stop processes just becasue you want 
to clean out IO queues? They are two totally different things!

		Linus
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/